In the book (and musical, and movie) Les Misérables,
former prisoner Jean Valjean finds himself released from prison in
Southern France, given a yellow passport marking him as a convict,
and ordered to report to Pontarlier for his parole. After a long
day’s journey, he attempts to find a place to stay for the night,
but is turned down by all the hotels in the area, and even the jail
and dog kennel refuses to provide him lodging.
Finally, he finds himself at the door
of a bishop’s house, where he pleads his case earnestly and begs
for mercy. The bishop has compassion and takes him in, but at
midnight, a conflicted Valjean steals the bishops silverware, and
disappears. The following day, Valjean is accosted by the police, the
silverware is discovered on him, and he is brought back to the
bishop, expecting condemnation and a return to the galleys. But the
bishop’s response surprises him.
"Ah! here you are!" he
exclaimed, looking at Jean Valjean. "I am glad to see you. Well,
but how is this? I gave you the candlesticks too, which are of silver
like the rest, and for which you can certainly get two hundred
francs. Why did you not carry them away with your forks and spoons?"
Valjean stares at him, eyes wide and
mouth agape, shocked at the mercy shown him. He is released,
trembling, the bishop gives him the candlesticks and, as the police
depart, leaves him with a solemn word.
"Jean Valjean, my brother, you no
longer belong to evil, but to good. It is your soul that I buy from
you; I withdraw it from black thoughts and the spirit of perdition,
and I give it to God."
A Virtuous Approach to Ethics
When I read this section of Les
Misérables, I’m struck with the humble, sacrificial character
of the bishop. His mercy and grace, paired with his devotion to God,
give a vivid picture of moral living that formal theories of ethics
can never capture.
Virtue ethics, first pioneered by the
Greek philosopher Aristotle, are different from other ethics in that
they focus on who we are instead of what we do. Virtue ethicists
focus on studying the character traits that make people moral, that
is, they study habits of moral living that are cultivated over time,
and talk about how to implement these habits in our daily lives.
Virtue ethics are based on imitation- they require someone before to
exemplify the moral virtue that is to be studied.
Virtue ethics shows a vital break from
other ethical theories. Where other ethical theories talk a lot about
calculating the optimific action, or appealing to inviolable
moral laws, virtue ethicists simply argue that virtuous actions will
flow out of a virtuous person. As a person becomes more accustomed to
living rightly, he no longer has to pay scrupulous attention to all
the rules of morality that are placed on him. Following them comes
naturally.
A perfect example of this is the growth
of a child. When he’s young, his parents place him under all sorts
of “dos” and “don’ts” and punishments and rewards. But by
the time he becomes a young man, he has become used to practicing
these habits and does them naturally without regard to the punishment
and rewards, and he gains satisfaction by knowing that he is living
justly.
Christianity and Virtue Ethics
In a sense, this seems a lot like the
flow of the law and the Gospel in Christian theology. In the Old
Testament, we find the law given to us, a strong moral code with
harsh punishments held for us to follow. But in the New Testament, we
are shown that the law is our guardian, meant to keep us until the
coming of Christ.
“So then, the law was our guardian
until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith. But
now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian, for in
Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith.” (Galatians
3:24-26)
In Christ, we find the perfect role
model to emulate -- Christ himself. We find a shift in emphasis from
rules to character, as Christ comes to fulfill the law. Now that
Christ has come to show us virtue, we can walk as mature Christians,
free from the law and all its condemnation and punishments. The law
is not abolished, but rather fulfilled, much like the rules and
regulations that the small child is put under are fulfilled by the
young man who walks uprightly.
A Flexible Moral Law?
All right, so, in my typical fashion,
let’s toss some controversy out there and get a discussion going!
In the story of Jean Valjean, amidst my admiration of the bishop for
his merciful and gracious actions, I’m sure some of you are
thinking something along the lines of “but he’s LYING, by golly!”
So I’ll toss a theory out there for
debate.
With young kids, you’ve got to set up
some pretty harsh “do not violate” rules of behavior. If you
give kids nothing but the underlying principle to work with, then
they’re going to do something… unintelligent. Take bedtime for
example. If you’re dealing with a 4-year-old, you make a law along
the lines of “thou shalt go to bed at 8 pm,” because a 4-year-old
is not going to know how to apply the principle “get a reasonable
amount of sleep” on his own. Is there a similar connection between
“thou shalt not lie” and the underlying principle of honesty? Or
put another way, when virtues of mercy and honesty conflict, which
wins out?
All righty guys, let’s get some
comments going! I’m watching the hit counters, and I know you’re
reading this, now I want to hear your thoughts!
By Nick Barden
By Nick Barden
Your last paragraph (well, not the one about comments) is something I have thought about for a long time. You'd think we're related or something...
ReplyDeleteBut really, what about Corrie ten Boom and all the people who lied to the Nazis about hiding Jews? What about Rahab, for that matter, who is commended throughout Scripture for lying?
I have not done a comprehensive study of the subject, but what strikes me most in Scripture is that we are told not to bear false witness against *neighbor*, that God hates a 'false witness,' etc. Not saying this is the way it should be, but if mercy conflicts with honesty, I would tend towards mercy every time.